Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
10 Lunchbox Minis0
VS
Pork blade chop, cooked Leader
Pork blade chop, cooked5

Pork blade chop, cooked leads 5–0 · 5 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pork blade chop, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Pork blade chop, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    250 kcal
    255 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    23 g
    26.54 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    2 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    2 g
    0 gWIN
  • Total fat
    44 g
    15.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    18 g
    4.49 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    1640 mg
    69 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    —
    259 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    —
    51 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0 mg
    0.81 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    —
    19 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.