Pork chop, cooked vs Salmon, cooked

Pork chop, cooked4

Salmon, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Salmon, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
209 kcal
206 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN25.61 g
22.1 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
11.06 g
12.35 g
Saturated fatless is better
3.52 g
2.4 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN55 mg
61 mg
Potassiummore is better
344 mg
384 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
WIN24 mg
15 mg
Ironmore is better
WIN0.79 mg
0.34 mg
Magnesiummore is better
25 mg
30 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
3.7 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.