Pork chop, cooked vs Shrimp, cooked

Leader

Pork chop, cooked4

Shrimp, cooked3

Pork chop, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Pork chop, cooked: 100 g · Shrimp, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Pork chop, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more iron.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
209 kcal
99 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN25.61 g
23.98 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0.2 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
—
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
—
Total fat
11.06 g
0.28 g
Saturated fatless is better
3.52 g
0.06 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN55 mg
111 mg
Potassiummore is better
WIN344 mg
259 mg
Calciummore is better
24 mg
70 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN0.79 mg
0.51 mg
Magnesiummore is better
25 mg
39 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.