Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Pork chop, cooked Leader
Pork chop, cooked4
VS
Turkey breast, cooked
Turkey breast, cooked3

Pork chop, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Pork chop, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Pork chop, cooked for less sodium, more potassium, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    209 kcal
    147 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    25.61 g
    30.13 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    11.06 g
    2.08 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.52 g
    0.59 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN55 mg
    99 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN344 mg
    249 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN24 mg
    9 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.79 mg
    0.71 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    25 mg
    32 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Pork chop, cooked vs Turkey breast, cooked · Foodatron