Salmon, cooked vs Yellowfin tuna, cooked

Salmon, cooked2

Leader

Yellowfin tuna, cooked6

Yellowfin tuna, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Yellowfin tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Salmon, cooked for more calcium and more vitamin C.

Pick Yellowfin tuna, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
206 kcal
130 kcal
Proteinmore is better
22.1 g
29.15 gWIN
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
12.35 g
0.59 g
Saturated fatless is better
2.4 g
0.21 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
61 mg
54 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
384 mg
527 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
WIN15 mg
4 mg
Ironmore is better
0.34 mg
0.92 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
30 mg
42 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
WIN3.7 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.