Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Shrimp, cooked Leader
Shrimp, cooked6
VS
Turkey breast, cooked
Turkey breast, cooked1

Shrimp, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Shrimp, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Shrimp, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Turkey breast, cooked for less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN24.22 g
    20.5 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0.2 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.28 g
    1.41 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.06 g
    0.4 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    112.12 mg
    67.35 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN261.62 mg
    169.39 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN70.71 mg
    6.12 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN0.52 mg
    0.48 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN39.39 mg
    21.77 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Shrimp, cooked vs Turkey breast, cooked · Foodatron