Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Skipjack tuna, cooked Leader
Skipjack tuna, cooked3
VS
Albacore Tuna1

Skipjack tuna, cooked leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided · 1 tie

Skipjack tuna, cooked: 100 g · Albacore Tuna: serving (142 g).

The verdict

Skipjack tuna, cooked comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Skipjack tuna, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Albacore Tuna for more protein.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    132 kcal
    180 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    28.21 g
    33 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    1.29 g
    5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.42 g
    1.5 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN47 mg
    310 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    522 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.6 mg
    1.51 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    44 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.