Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Whelk, cooked Leader
Whelk, cooked3
VS
Albacore Tuna1

Whelk, cooked leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided · 1 tie

Whelk, cooked: 100 g · Albacore Tuna: serving (142 g).

The verdict

Whelk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Whelk, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and more iron.

Pick Albacore Tuna for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    275 kcal
    180 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN47.68 g
    33 g
  • Carbohydrate
    15.52 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.8 g
    5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.06 g
    1.5 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    412 mg
    310 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    694 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    113 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN10.06 mg
    1.51 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    172 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    6.8 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.