Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Whiting, cooked Leader
Whiting, cooked3
VS
Albacore Tuna1

Whiting, cooked leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Whiting, cooked comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Whiting, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Albacore Tuna for more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    116 kcal
    126.76 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN23.48 g
    23.24 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    1.69 g
    3.52 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.4 g
    1.06 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN132 mg
    218.31 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    434 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    62 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    0.42 mg
    1.06 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    27 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.