Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked2
VS
Scottish Mackerel Fillets1

Abalone, cooked leads 2–1 · 3 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 2 of 3 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein and less saturated fat.

Pick Scottish Mackerel Fillets for less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN10.39 g
    7.29 g
  • Carbohydrate
    5.85 g
    1.77 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    1.77 g
  • Total fat
    3.59 g
    7.29 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.87 g
    1.61 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    312.7 mg
    153.65 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    150.26 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    19.58 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    2.01 mg
    —
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29.63 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.95 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Scottish Mackerel Fillets · Foodatron