Abalone, cooked vs Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets

Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more iron.

Pick Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets for more protein, more fiber, less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
189 kcal
166.67 kcal
Proteinmore is better
19.63 g
20 gWIN
Carbohydrate
11.05 g
1.25 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
1.25 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
—
0 g
Total fat
6.78 g
8.75 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.65 g
1.25 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
591 mg
412.5 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
284 mg
—
Calciummore is better
37 mg
125 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
WIN3.8 mg
2.38 mg
Magnesiummore is better
56 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
1.8 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.