Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked5
VS
Caviar (fish roe)
Caviar (fish roe)3

Abalone, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Pick Caviar (fish roe) for more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN10.39 g
    9.32 g
  • Carbohydrate
    5.85 g
    1.52 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0 g
  • Total fat
    3.59 g
    6.78 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.87 g
    1.54 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN312.7 mg
    568.18 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN150.26 mg
    68.56 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    19.58 mg
    104.17 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.01 mg
    4.5 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29.63 mg
    113.64 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.95 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Caviar (fish roe) · Foodatron