Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked Leader
Abalone, cooked4
VS
Cusk, cooked
Cusk, cooked3

Abalone, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Cusk, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Abalone, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Cusk, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    112 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    24.35 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    0.88 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    591 mg
    40 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    503 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37 mg
    13 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.8 mg
    1.06 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56 mg
    40 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN1.8 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Cusk, cooked · Foodatron