Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked3
VS
Cusk, cooked Leader
Cusk, cooked4

Cusk, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Cusk, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Pick Cusk, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    10.39 g
    21.74 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.85 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.59 g
    0.79 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.87 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    312.7 mg
    35.71 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    150.26 mg
    449.11 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN19.58 mg
    11.61 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.01 mg
    0.95 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29.63 mg
    35.71 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.95 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Cusk, cooked · Foodatron