Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked1
VS
Cuttlefish, cooked Leader
Cuttlefish, cooked7

Cuttlefish, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Cuttlefish, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    189 kcal
    158 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    19.63 g
    32.48 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    11.05 g
    1.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    6.78 g
    1.4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.24 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN591 mg
    744 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    284 mg
    637 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    37 mg
    180 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    3.8 mg
    10.84 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    56 mg
    60 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.8 mg
    8.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Cuttlefish, cooked · Foodatron