Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, cooked
Abalone, cooked1
VS
Cuttlefish, cooked Leader
Cuttlefish, cooked7

Cuttlefish, cooked leads 7–1 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Cuttlefish, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Cuttlefish, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    10.39 g
    20.56 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.85 g
    1.04 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    3.59 g
    0.89 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.87 g
    0.15 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN312.7 mg
    470.89 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    150.26 mg
    403.16 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    19.58 mg
    113.92 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.01 mg
    6.86 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    29.63 mg
    37.97 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0.95 mg
    5.38 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, cooked vs Cuttlefish, cooked · Foodatron