Abalone, cooked vs Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce

Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided

Abalone, cooked: 100 g · Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce: 63 g.

The verdict

Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for more protein.

Pick Skinless & Boneless Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce for more fiber, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
189 kcal
86 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN19.63 g
8.7 g
Carbohydrate
11.05 g
0.8 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
1.9 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
—
0.8 g
Total fat
6.78 g
6.3 g
Saturated fatless is better
1.65 g
1.5 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
591 mg
390 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
284 mg
—
Calciummore is better
37 mg
—
Ironmore is better
3.8 mg
—
Magnesiummore is better
56 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
1.8 mg
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.