Abalone, cooked vs Oysters, cooked

Abalone, cooked3

Leader

Oysters, cooked5

Oysters, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Oysters, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Pick Oysters, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
10.39 g
11.2 gWIN
Carbohydrate
5.85 g
5.34 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
—
1.21 g
Total fat
3.59 g
3.35 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.87 g
0.93 g
Sodiumless is better
312.7 mg
162.75 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
WIN150.26 mg
136.27 mg
Calciummore is better
19.58 mg
113.73 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
2.01 mg
9.03 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
29.63 mg
34.31 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
WIN0.95 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.