Abalone, raw vs Octopus, cooked

Abalone, raw2

Leader

Octopus, cooked6

Octopus, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Octopus, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Octopus, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Pick Octopus, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
105 kcal
164 kcal
Proteinmore is better
17.1 g
29.82 gWIN
Carbohydrate
6.01 g
4.4 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
0.76 g
2.08 g
Saturated fatless is better
WIN0.15 g
0.45 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN301 mg
460 mg
Potassiummore is better
250 mg
630 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
31 mg
106 mgWIN
Ironmore is better
3.19 mg
9.54 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
48 mg
60 mgWIN
Vitamin Cmore is better
2 mg
8 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.