Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Abalone, raw
Abalone, raw2
VS
Octopus, cooked Leader
Octopus, cooked6

Octopus, cooked leads 6–2 · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Octopus, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for less saturated fat and more magnesium.

Pick Octopus, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    16.29 g
    18.18 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    5.72 g
    2.68 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    0.72 g
    1.27 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.14 g
    0.28 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    286.67 mg
    280.49 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    238.1 mg
    384.15 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    29.52 mg
    64.63 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    3.04 mg
    5.82 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN45.71 mg
    36.59 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    1.9 mg
    4.88 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Octopus, cooked · Foodatron