Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Abalone, raw Leader
Abalone, raw5
VS
Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce1

Abalone, raw leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided

Abalone, raw: 100 g · Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce: 125 g.

The verdict

Abalone, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Abalone, raw for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce for more fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    105 kcal
    254 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.1 g
    15.5 g
  • Carbohydrate
    6.01 g
    4.2 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    1.8 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    4.2 g
  • Total fat
    0.76 g
    19 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.15 g
    3.7 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN301 mg
    330 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    250 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    31 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN3.19 mg
    0 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    48 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    2 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Abalone, raw vs Mackerel Fillets In Tomato Sauce · Foodatron