Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw Leader
Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw5
VS
Sour cherries, raw
Sour cherries, raw4

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw for more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Sour cherries, raw for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    1.25 g
    2 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    24.03 g
    24.36 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN3.44 g
    3.2 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    16.98 g
  • Total fat
    0.94 g
    0.6 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.21 g
    0.14 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    21.88 mg
    6 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN456.25 mg
    346 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN37.5 mg
    32 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.63 mg
    0.64 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN56.25 mg
    18 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN5242.5 mg
    20 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acerola (West Indian cherry), raw vs Sour cherries, raw · Foodatron