Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked
Acorn squash, cooked4
VS
Epazote, raw
Epazote, raw4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided

Acorn squash, cooked: 100 g · Epazote, raw: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more protein, more fiber, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Pick Epazote, raw for more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    56 kcal
    32 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN1.12 g
    0.33 g
  • Carbohydrate
    14.58 g
    7.44 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.4 g
    3.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.14 g
    0.52 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.03 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN4 mg
    43 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    437 mg
    633 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    44 mg
    275 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.93 mg
    1.88 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    43 mg
    121 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN10.8 mg
    3.6 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Epazote, raw · Foodatron