Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Acorn squash, cooked
Acorn squash, cooked3
VS
Epazote, raw Leader
Epazote, raw5

Epazote, raw leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Epazote, raw comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Acorn squash, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Pick Epazote, raw for more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN2 g
    1.03 g
  • Carbohydrate
    26.04 g
    23.25 g
  • Fibermore is better
    7.86 g
    11.88 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.25 g
    1.63 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.05 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN7.14 mg
    134.38 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    780.36 mg
    1978.13 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    78.57 mg
    859.38 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.66 mg
    5.88 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    76.79 mg
    378.13 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN19.29 mg
    11.25 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Acorn squash, cooked vs Epazote, raw · Foodatron