Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Agar seaweed, raw
Agar seaweed, raw4
VS
Taro leaves, cooked Leader
Taro leaves, cooked5

Taro leaves, cooked leads 5–4 · 9 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Taro leaves, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Agar seaweed, raw for less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Taro leaves, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.08 g
    11.33 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    25.96 g
    16.21 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.92 g
    8.33 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.08 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.12 g
    1.71 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.02 g
    0.35 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN34.62 mg
    991.67 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    869.23 mg
    1916.67 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    207.69 mg
    358.33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.15 mg
    4.92 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN257.69 mg
    83.33 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    147.92 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Agar seaweed, raw vs Taro leaves, cooked · Foodatron