Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Agar seaweed, raw
Agar seaweed, raw4
VS
Taro shoots, cooked
Taro shoots, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Agar seaweed, raw for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Taro shoots, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium and more vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.08 g
    5.21 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    25.96 g
    22.86 g
  • Fibermore is better
    1.92 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    1.08 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.12 g
    0.57 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.02 g
    0.11 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    34.62 mg
    14.29 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    869.23 mg
    2457.14 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN207.69 mg
    100 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.15 mg
    2.93 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN257.69 mg
    57.14 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    135 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Agar seaweed, raw vs Taro shoots, cooked · Foodatron