Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
All-purpose flour
All-purpose flour1
VS
Teff, cooked Leader
Teff, cooked6

Teff, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Teff, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick All-purpose flour for less sodium.

Pick Teff, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    2.84 g
    3.83 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    20.96 g
    19.66 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.74 g
    2.77 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0.07 g
    —
  • Total fat
    0.27 g
    0.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.04 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN0.55 mg
    7.92 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    29.4 mg
    105.94 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    4.12 mg
    48.51 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.27 mg
    2.03 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    6.04 mg
    49.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

All-purpose flour vs Teff, cooked · Foodatron