Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked Leader
Amaranth, cooked5
VS
Pancakes, plain
Pancakes, plain1

Amaranth, cooked leads 5–1 · 6 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Amaranth, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 6 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Pancakes, plain for more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN3.73 g
    2.82 g
  • Carbohydrate
    18.32 g
    12.47 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.06 g
    —
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    1.55 g
    4.27 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.93 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN5.88 mg
    193.39 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN132.35 mg
    58.15 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    46.08 mg
    96.48 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.06 mg
    0.79 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN63.73 mg
    7.05 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0.13 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Pancakes, plain · Foodatron