Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Amaranth, cooked
Amaranth, cooked3
VS
Triticale flour Leader
Triticale flour4

Triticale flour leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Triticale flour comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Triticale flour for more protein, more fiber, less sodium and more potassium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    3.73 g
    3.9 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    18.32 g
    21.64 g
  • Fibermore is better
    2.06 g
    4.32 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    1.55 g
    0.54 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    —
    0.09 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    5.88 mg
    0.59 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    132.35 mg
    137.87 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN46.08 mg
    10.36 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.06 mg
    0.77 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN63.73 mg
    45.27 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    —
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth, cooked vs Triticale flour · Foodatron