Amaranth, cooked vs Weetabix

Weetabix leads 3–1 · 4 categories decided

Amaranth, cooked: 100 g · Weetabix: 38 g.

The verdict

Weetabix comes out ahead, winning 3 of 4 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for less sodium.

Pick Weetabix for more protein, more fiber and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
102 kcal
157.14 kcal
Proteinmore is better
3.8 g
4.56 gWIN
Carbohydrate
18.69 g
26.22 g
Fibermore is better
2.1 g
3.8 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
—
1.6 g
Total fat
1.58 g
0.76 g
Saturated fatless is better
—
0.23 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN6 mg
42.56 mg
Potassiummore is better
135 mg
—
Calciummore is better
47 mg
—
Ironmore is better
2.1 mg
4.62 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
65 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
—
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.