Amaranth, cooked vs Weetabix

Amaranth, cooked2

Weetabix2

Dead heat · 4 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 2 of 4 match-ups.

Pick Amaranth, cooked for more protein and less sodium.

Pick Weetabix for more fiber and more iron.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
100 kcal
100 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN3.73 g
2.9 g
Carbohydrate
18.32 g
16.69 g
Fibermore is better
2.06 g
2.42 gWIN
Total sugarsless is better
—
1.02 g
Total fat
1.55 g
0.48 g
Saturated fatless is better
—
0.15 g
Sodiumless is better
WIN5.88 mg
27.08 mg
Potassiummore is better
132.35 mg
—
Calciummore is better
46.08 mg
—
Ironmore is better
2.06 mg
2.94 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
63.73 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
—
—
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.