Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Plate
Amaranth grain, uncooked Leader
Amaranth grain, uncooked4
VS
Old Fashioned Rolled Oats Whole Grain3

Amaranth grain, uncooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Amaranth grain, uncooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Amaranth grain, uncooked for more protein, less sugar, more calcium and more iron.

Pick Old Fashioned Rolled Oats Whole Grain for more fiber, less saturated fat and less sodium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    371 kcal
    375 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN13.56 g
    10.42 g
  • Carbohydrate
    65.25 g
    68.75 g
  • Fibermore is better
    6.7 g
    8.33 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN1.69 g
    2.08 g
  • Total fat
    7.02 g
    7.29 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.46 g
    1.04 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    4 mg
    0 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    508 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN159 mg
    43.75 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN7.61 mg
    4.17 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    248 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    4.2 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Amaranth grain, uncooked vs Old Fashioned Rolled Oats Whole Grain · Foodatron