Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowroot flour
Arrowroot flour2
VS
Teff, cooked Leader
Teff, cooked5

Teff, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided

Arrowroot flour: 100 g · Teff, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Teff, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowroot flour for more fiber and less sodium.

Pick Teff, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    357 kcal
    101 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.3 g
    3.87 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    88.15 g
    19.86 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN3.4 g
    2.8 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.1 g
    0.65 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.02 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN2 mg
    8 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    11 mg
    107 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    40 mg
    49 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.33 mg
    2.05 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    3 mg
    50 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowroot flour vs Teff, cooked · Foodatron