Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowroot flour
Arrowroot flour1
VS
Teff, cooked Leader
Teff, cooked6

Teff, cooked leads 6–1 · 7 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Teff, cooked comes out ahead, winning 6 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowroot flour for less sodium.

Pick Teff, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.08 g
    3.83 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    24.69 g
    19.66 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.95 g
    2.77 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    —
  • Total fat
    0.03 g
    0.64 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.01 g
    —
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN0.56 mg
    7.92 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    3.08 mg
    105.94 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    11.2 mg
    48.51 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    0.09 mg
    2.03 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    0.84 mg
    49.5 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowroot flour vs Teff, cooked · Foodatron