Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Arrowroot flour
Arrowroot flour3
VS
Whole wheat pasta, cooked Leader
Whole wheat pasta, cooked5

Whole wheat pasta, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Whole wheat pasta, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Arrowroot flour for less saturated fat, less sodium and more calcium.

Pick Whole wheat pasta, cooked for more protein, more fiber, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    0.08 g
    3.66 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    24.69 g
    19.82 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0.95 g
    2.89 gWIN
  • Total sugarsless is better
    —
    0.53 g
  • Total fat
    0.03 g
    0.94 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.01 g
    0.15 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN0.56 mg
    3.77 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    3.08 mg
    48.43 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN11.2 mg
    7.55 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    0.09 mg
    1.04 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    0.84 mg
    28.3 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Arrowroot flour vs Whole wheat pasta, cooked · Foodatron