Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bacon, cooked Leader
Bacon, cooked5
VS
Ham, roasted
Ham, roasted2

Bacon, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Bacon, cooked: 100 g · Ham, roasted: 100 g.

The verdict

Bacon, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bacon, cooked for more protein, more potassium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Ham, roasted for less saturated fat and less sodium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    548 kcal
    157 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN35.73 g
    25.05 g
  • Carbohydrate
    1.35 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    43.27 g
    5.5 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    14.19 g
    1.84 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    2193 mg
    1327 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN539 mg
    316 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN10 mg
    7 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.49 mg
    0.94 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN30 mg
    22 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bacon, cooked vs Ham, roasted · Foodatron