Bacon, cooked vs Kielbasa

Bacon, cooked2

Leader

Kielbasa3

Kielbasa leads 3–2 · 5 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Kielbasa comes out ahead, winning 3 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bacon, cooked for more protein and more iron.

Pick Kielbasa for less saturated fat, less sodium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
548 kcal
226 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN35.73 g
13.1 g
Carbohydrate
1.35 g
3.9 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
43.27 g
17.6 g
Saturated fatless is better
14.19 g
6.23 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
2193 mg
1200 mgWIN
Potassiummore is better
539 mg
—
Calciummore is better
10 mg
—
Ironmore is better
WIN1.49 mg
1.24 mg
Magnesiummore is better
30 mg
—
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
14.8 mgWIN
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.