Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bean dip Leader
Bean dip8
VS
Chili con carne with beans
Chili con carne with beans2

Bean dip leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Bean dip: 100 g · Chili con carne with beans: 100 g.

The verdict

Bean dip comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bean dip for more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    119 kcal
    107 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    5.44 g
    5.8 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    15.89 g
    13.1 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.9 g
    3.3 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.99 g
    1.87 g
  • Total fat
    3.7 g
    3.47 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.53 g
    1.25 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN443 mg
    449 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN368 mg
    264 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    26 mg
    33 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.6 mg
    1.34 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN40 mg
    28 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.6 mg
    0.2 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bean dip vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron