Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Bean dip Leader
Bean dip8
VS
Chili con carne with beans
Chili con carne with beans2

Bean dip leads 8–2 · 10 categories decided

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Bean dip comes out ahead, winning 8 of 10 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Bean dip for more fiber, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Pick Chili con carne with beans for more protein and more calcium.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    4.57 g
    5.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    13.35 g
    12.24 g
  • Fibermore is better
    WIN4.12 g
    3.08 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0.83 g
    1.75 g
  • Total fat
    3.11 g
    3.24 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN0.44 g
    1.17 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN372.27 mg
    419.63 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN309.24 mg
    246.73 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    21.85 mg
    30.84 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.34 mg
    1.25 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN33.61 mg
    26.17 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    WIN0.5 mg
    0.19 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Bean dip vs Chili con carne with beans · Foodatron