Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked7
VS
Bologna
Bologna2

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 7–2 · 9 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 7 of 9 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sugar, less saturated fat, less sodium, more potassium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Bologna for more calcium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14.23 g
    4.94 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.78 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    WIN0 g
    1.44 g
  • Total fat
    4.35 g
    7.98 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.56 g
    3.02 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN18.26 mg
    311.69 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN114.78 mg
    102.27 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    3.04 mg
    27.6 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.18 mg
    0.39 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN9.13 mg
    5.52 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.26 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Bologna · Foodatron