Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked Leader
Beef bottom round, cooked4
VS
Kielbasa
Kielbasa1

Beef bottom round, cooked leads 4–1 · 5 categories decided · 2 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef bottom round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 5 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Kielbasa for more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14.23 g
    5.8 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.73 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.35 g
    7.79 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN1.56 g
    2.76 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN18.26 mg
    530.97 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    114.78 mg
    —
  • Calciummore is better
    3.04 mg
    —
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.18 mg
    0.55 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.13 mg
    —
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    6.55 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Kielbasa · Foodatron