Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Lamb liver, cooked Leader
Lamb liver, cooked5

Lamb liver, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Lamb liver, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Lamb liver, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    230 kcal
    220 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.73 g
    30.57 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    2.53 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    10 g
    8.81 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.59 g
    3.41 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN42 mg
    56 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN264 mg
    221 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    7 mg
    8 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    2.71 mg
    8.28 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    21 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    4 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Lamb liver, cooked · Foodatron