Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked3
VS
Lamb liver, cooked Leader
Lamb liver, cooked5

Lamb liver, cooked leads 5–3 · 8 categories decided · 1 tie

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Lamb liver, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 8 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more potassium.

Pick Lamb liver, cooked for less saturated fat, more calcium, more iron, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN14.23 g
    13.9 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    1.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    —
  • Total fat
    4.35 g
    4 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.56 g
    1.55 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN18.26 mg
    25.45 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN114.78 mg
    100.45 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    3.04 mg
    3.64 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    1.18 mg
    3.76 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.13 mg
    10 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    1.82 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Lamb liver, cooked · Foodatron