Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef bottom round, cooked
Beef bottom round, cooked2
VS
Pork tenderloin, cooked Leader
Pork tenderloin, cooked5

Pork tenderloin, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Pork tenderloin, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef bottom round, cooked for less sodium and more iron.

Pick Pork tenderloin, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium, more calcium and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    14.23 g
    18.3 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.35 g
    2.45 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.56 g
    0.84 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN18.26 mg
    39.86 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    114.78 mg
    294.41 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    3.04 mg
    4.2 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.18 mg
    0.8 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    9.13 mg
    20.28 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef bottom round, cooked vs Pork tenderloin, cooked · Foodatron