Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked Leader
Beef brisket, cooked5
VS
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked2

Beef brisket, cooked leads 5–2 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Beef brisket, cooked: 100 g · Beef eye of round, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

Beef brisket, cooked comes out ahead, winning 5 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for more protein, less sodium, more calcium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for less saturated fat and more potassium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    221 kcal
    171 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN32.21 g
    29.79 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    9.24 g
    4.83 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    3.64 g
    1.66 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN52 mg
    66 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    254 mg
    408 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN17 mg
    16 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.75 mg
    1.86 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN21 mg
    15 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.