Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef brisket, cooked
Beef brisket, cooked3
VS
Beef eye of round, cooked Leader
Beef eye of round, cooked4

Beef eye of round, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef eye of round, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef brisket, cooked for less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, more potassium and more calcium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    14.57 g
    17.42 gWIN
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.18 g
    2.82 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.65 g
    0.97 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN23.53 mg
    38.6 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    114.93 mg
    238.6 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    7.69 mg
    9.36 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN1.24 mg
    1.09 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    WIN9.5 mg
    8.77 mg
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef brisket, cooked vs Beef eye of round, cooked · Foodatron