Beef chuck roast, cooked vs Goat, cooked

Beef chuck roast, cooked3

Goat, cooked3

Dead heat · 6 categories decided · 4 ties

Beef chuck roast, cooked: 100 g · Goat, cooked: 100 g.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 3 of 6 match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less sodium and more magnesium.

Pick Goat, cooked for less saturated fat, more potassium and more iron.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar, calcium and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common serving Equal calories

Head-to-head

Energy
283 kcal
143 kcal
Proteinmore is better
WIN29.23 g
27.1 g
Carbohydrate
0 g
0 g
Fibermore is better
0 g
0 g
Total sugarsless is better
0 g
0 g
Total fat
17.56 g
3.03 g
Saturated fatless is better
6.91 g
0.93 gWIN
Sodiumless is better
WIN48 mg
86 mg
Potassiummore is better
235 mg
405 mgWIN
Calciummore is better
17 mg
17 mg
Ironmore is better
2.38 mg
3.73 mgWIN
Magnesiummore is better
WIN19 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Cmore is better
0 mg
0 mg
Vitamin Dmore is better
—
—

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.