Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef chuck roast, cooked
Beef chuck roast, cooked4
VS
Ground pork, cooked
Ground pork, cooked4

Dead heat · 8 categories decided · 2 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

It's a dead heat — each wins 4 of 8 match-ups.

Pick Beef chuck roast, cooked for more protein, less saturated fat, less sodium and more iron.

Pick Ground pork, cooked for more potassium, more calcium, more magnesium and more vitamin C.

Evenly matched on fiber and sugar.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    283 kcal
    297 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.23 g
    25.69 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    17.56 g
    20.77 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    WIN6.91 g
    7.72 g
  • Sodiumless is better
    WIN48 mg
    73 mg
  • Potassiummore is better
    235 mg
    362 mgWIN
  • Calciummore is better
    17 mg
    22 mgWIN
  • Ironmore is better
    WIN2.38 mg
    1.29 mg
  • Magnesiummore is better
    19 mg
    24 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0.7 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.