Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Beef heart, cooked Leader
Beef heart, cooked4

Beef heart, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Each value is per 100 g edible portion.

The verdict

Beef heart, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef heart, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    171 kcal
    165 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN29.79 g
    28.48 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.15 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    4.83 g
    4.73 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    1.66 g
    1.4 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    66 mg
    59 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN408 mg
    219 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN16 mg
    5 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.86 mg
    6.38 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    15 mg
    21 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef heart, cooked · Foodatron