Skip to content
Foodatron logoFoodatron
Beef eye of round, cooked
Beef eye of round, cooked3
VS
Beef heart, cooked Leader
Beef heart, cooked4

Beef heart, cooked leads 4–3 · 7 categories decided · 3 ties

Both foods compared at 100 kcal.

The verdict

Beef heart, cooked comes out ahead, winning 4 of 7 nutrient match-ups.

Pick Beef eye of round, cooked for more protein, more potassium and more calcium.

Pick Beef heart, cooked for less saturated fat, less sodium, more iron and more magnesium.

Evenly matched on fiber, sugar and vitamin C.

Equal weight (per 100 g)Common servingEqual calories

Head-to-head

  • Energy
    100 kcal
    100 kcal
  • Proteinmore is better
    WIN17.42 g
    17.26 g
  • Carbohydrate
    0 g
    0.09 g
  • Fibermore is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total sugarsless is better
    0 g
    0 g
  • Total fat
    2.82 g
    2.87 g
  • Saturated fatless is better
    0.97 g
    0.85 gWIN
  • Sodiumless is better
    38.6 mg
    35.76 mgWIN
  • Potassiummore is better
    WIN238.6 mg
    132.73 mg
  • Calciummore is better
    WIN9.36 mg
    3.03 mg
  • Ironmore is better
    1.09 mg
    3.87 mgWIN
  • Magnesiummore is better
    8.77 mg
    12.73 mgWIN
  • Vitamin Cmore is better
    0 mg
    0 mg
  • Vitamin Dmore is better
    —
    —

Winners are decided by deterministic per-metric rules on the stated basis; ties and missing data don’t score (missing ≠ zero). Educational information only — not medical advice.

Beef eye of round, cooked vs Beef heart, cooked · Foodatron